Wednesday, July 17, 2024
HomeIran News NowLatest News on Iranian TerrorismFormer intel minister voices alarmed about international resolve against Iranian ‎regime

Former intel minister voices alarmed about international resolve against Iranian ‎regime

YunisNCRI – A former intelligence minister of the Iranian regime has raised alarm about the ‎international community’s consensus against the clerical regime and the possibility of a ‎military strike.‎

According to the state-affiliated Parliament News, Ali Younesi said, “Threats exist. Just ‎listen to most of the interviews and remarks made by our own military officials, who refer ‎to these foreign threats all the time.”‎

 

He added, “I am extremely worried about the sanctions and their adverse consequences. I ‎don’t see a military strike occur in the near future, but it is nonetheless a very strong and ‎significant probability and requires the adoption of necessary pre-emptive measures.”‎

Younesi also referred to the crucial need for the regime to interfere in Iraqi affairs, and ‎said, “Today, thanks to Iranian involvement in Iraq, security threats have been thwarted ‎and, moreover, the Iraqi market now serves as a golden opportunity for our exports. We ‎must do everything we can to expand our broad-based influence.”‎

Younesi, who acted as the intelligence minister for the mullahs’ former president ‎Mohammad Khatami, highlighted the imperative of the policy of exporting ‎fundamentalism for the illegitimate clerical regime and said, “If we retreat from regional ‎countries, our competitors or enemies will fill the vacuum and turn those places into bases ‎of cultural and economic assaults against us.”‎

‎“We must therefore strengthen the groups, governments and movements that are aligned ‎with our position in the region, such as the Lebanese Hezbollah, Palestine and Iraq.”‎

Younesi added, “This was a policy that was made prevalent with resolve and with care in ‎all the previous eras, including in the governments of [Ali Akbar Hashemi] Rafsanjani and ‎Khatami.”‎

‎“It was a policy,” he added, “based on a deep understanding and expertise when it comes ‎to actual and potential threats and our country’s long-term interests. So, no government ‎would be able to change the policy’s tenets.”‎